We Need Queer Theology; Not Affirming Theology
By Kalie Hargrove
The Reformation Project's decision to take a stance against Queer Theology is not only disheartening, but harmful to those who are the most marginalized.
This week, The Reformation Project (TRP) went public with its stance against Queer Theology in favor of “affirming theology.” Specifically, they believe that “Because queer theology adopts the categorically anti-normative posture and methodology of queer theory, it represents a radical rupture from the affirming position that the vast majority of affirming Christians hold.” However, this stance is not only harmful to those who still find faith in the Christian tradition, it undermines the work from every subversive movement within Christianity, including Liberation and Womanist movements, and maintains the power structures that cause harm.
Unfortunately, instead of using a quantifiable definition and unbiased assessment, TRP created a straw man argument while using maligning language to create a false understanding of Queer Theology and theory. However, in this reflection, I will use their straw man to demonstrate they are still creating a harmful theology. -
Apologetics for Inclusion?
In their opening phrasing, TRP highlights the fact that a major difference between their theology and Queer Theology is the fact that “[Q]ueer (sic)theology is not about apologetics.” In this framing, the purpose of their work in affirming theology is about arguing for inclusion into Christian spaces. However, we need to ask if that is even something that should be sought…
Kalie Hargrove (she/her)